[Health professionals facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: What are the mental health risks?] / Les professionnels de santé face à la pandémie de la maladie à coronavirus (COVID-19) : quels risques pour leur santé mentale ?

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused major sanitary crisis worldwide. Half of the world has been placed in quarantine. In France, this large-scale health crisis urgently triggered the restructuring and reorganization of health service delivery to support emergency services, medical intensive care units and continuing care units. Health professionals mobilized all their resources to provide emergency aid in a general climate of uncertainty. Concerns about the mental health, psychological adjustment, and recovery of health care workers treating and caring for patients with COVID-19 are now arising. The goal of the present article is to provide up-to-date information on potential mental health risks associated with exposure of health professionals to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Authors performed a narrative review identifying relevant results in the scientific and medical literature considering previous epidemics of 2003 (SARS-CoV-1) and 2009 (H1N1) with the more recent data about the COVID-19 pandemic. We highlighted most relevant data concerning the disease characteristics, the organizational factors and personal factors that may contribute to developing psychological distress and other mental health symptoms. RESULTS: The disease characteristics of the current COVID-19 pandemic provoked a generalized climate of wariness and uncertainty, particularly among health professionals, due to a range of causes such as the rapid spread of COVID-19, the severity of symptoms it can cause in a segment of infected individuals, the lack of knowledge of the disease, and deaths among health professionals. Stress may also be caused by organizational factors, such as depletion of personal protection equipment, concerns about not being able to provide competent care if deployed to new area, concerns about rapidly changing information, lack of access to up-to-date information and communication, lack of specific drugs, the shortage of ventilators and intensive care unit beds necessary to care for the surge of critically ill patients, and significant change in their daily social and family life. Further risk factors have been identified, including feelings of being inadequately supported, concerns about health of self, fear of taking home infection to family members or others, and not having rapid access to testing through occupational health if needed, being isolated, feelings of uncertainty and social stigmatization, overwhelming workload, or insecure attachment. Additionally, we discussed positive social and organizational factors that contribute to enhance resilience in the face of the pandemic. There is a consensus in all the relevant literature that health care professionals are at an increased risk of high levels of stress, anxiety, depression, burnout, addiction and post-traumatic stress disorder, which could have long-term psychological implications. CONCLUSIONS: In the long run, this tragic health crisis should significantly enhance our understanding of the mental health risk factors among the health care professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic. Reporting information such as this is essential to plan future prevention strategies. Protecting health care professionals is indeed an important component of public health measures to address large-scale health crisis. Thus, interventions to promote mental well-being in health care professionals exposed to COVID-19 need to be immediately implemented, and to strengthen prevention and response strategies by training health care professionals on mental help and crisis management.

[Mental health service utilization among borderline personality disorder patients inpatient]. / Utilisation des services de soin par les patients hospitalisés, présentant un trouble de personnalité borderline en Midi-Pyrénées.

BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by a pervasive pattern of instability and impulsivity. Several North American prospective studies support the high level of mental health care utilization in this population. There is little data in other systems of health organization, such as France. Furthermore, little is known on the variables associated with the mental health service utilization among BPD patients. OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to compare the utilization of mental health care among BPD patients, to the general population and patients with another personality disorder (PD) and to describe the demographic and clinical factors associated with the group of patients who use the most health care. METHOD: A multi-center (5 public and private centers), epidemiological study. Data were collected prospectively (database of an insurance fund covering 80% of the population) and viewed, retrospectively. We used the data collected during the five years previously to the inclusion. Inclusion criteria were age (18-60 years) and membership in the health insurance fund targeted. Patients on legal protection, forced hospitalization, with a chronic psychotic disorder, manic, mental retardation, or not reading French were excluded. First, four groups were composed: BPD, other PD, control groups for PD and other PD. The first two groups were recruited from a screening of inpatients including a self-administered questionnaire (Personality Disorder Questionnaire 4+). Assessment by a psychologist including the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SIDP-IV) was given straight to those who had a score above 28. This questionnaire allowed us to distinguish one group of subjects with BPD and a group with other PD (without BPD). Clinical evaluation included Axis I (MINI), Axis II (SIDP-IV), psychopathological features (YSQ-I, DSQ-40), demographic variables and therapeutic alliance (Haq-II). Matched controls (age, sex) composed the 3rd and 4th group (BPD control and other PD control). They were randomly chosen in the health database insurance previously used. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven (95.8%) screened patients agreed to answer the psychological assessment. In this sample, 44 (32.1%) had BPD, 39 (28.5%) other PD and another 39 (28.5%) did not have PD. The BPD group was compared to a sample of 165 matched subjects and the other group PD to a sample of 123 matched controls. There was no difference between BPD and other PD groups regarding the mental health utilization. However, there was an increased use of hospitalizations and deliverances of nervous system drugs in both clinical groups compared to their controls. The analysis of drugs supplied in pharmacies for BPD patients showed that the first two drugs were opiate substitutes (12.3% methadone, buprenorphine 6.7%). No anticonvulsants or atypical antipsychotics appear in the top 20 of treatments delivered. A composite variable (hospitalization for more than 6 months during previous five years and 500 supplied drugs) allowed the discrimination of two groups among patients with BPD: heavy users of care and low care users. No variables (demographics, Axis I, Axis II, self-aggressiveness, DSQ-40, Haq-II, YSQ-I) could discriminate the two groups except the number of previous psychotherapies (heavy users: n=0.4 (SD 0.5) vs low users: n=1.8 (SD 2.1) P=0.0054). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the important use of the service of BPD patients in France, as well as the possible moderating role of psychotherapy. We found a mismatch between these uses and recommendations.

[Should hospitalization be required after the emergency discharge of patients with borderline personality disorder who have attempted suicide (FRENCH CRISIS cohort)?]. / Faut-il hospitaliser les patients suicidants avec trouble de personnalité borderline après leur prise en charge aux urgences (étude prospective FRENCH CRISIS) ?

BACKGROUND: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by a pervasive pattern of instability and impulsivity. There is a high prevalence of BPD patients among those admitted to the emergency department for suicide attempts. However, little empirical research exists to assist clinicians in deciding whether to hospitalize a suicidal patient. Some authors have argued that hospitalization does not prevent suicide and could actually harm these patients, thereby leading to psychosocial regression. Parasuicidal behaviors could be reinforced by the attention given during hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether the hospitalization of suicidal patients who have a high risk of BPD after discharge from the emergency department is associated with a recurrence of suicidal behavior at 6months. METHOD: We designed a prospective study, acquiring patients from three emergency hospitals. The participants were suicidal subjects admitted for voluntary drug intoxication and were 18years of age or older. The participants completed the Personality Disorder Questionnaire (PDQ-4+) to assess BPD symptomatology. Information on the recurrence of suicidal behavior at 6months was obtained by interview of patients and the review of the charts from the 3 hospitals involved in the study. Other assessments included the BDI-13 (severity of depression), the Hopelessness Scale (hopelessness), the TAS-20 (alexythymia), the AUDIT (alcohol disorder) and the MINI (axis I disorders). RESULTS: A total of 606 subjects admitted for a suicide attempt participated in this study. A total of 320 (52.8 %) of the subjects completed the PDQ-4+. The sample was divided into three groups: participants at high risk of having at least one BPD (n=197), a group at high risk of having at least one non-BPD PD (n=84) and a group with low risk of having a PD (n=39). Hospitalization following an emergency was not associated with a recurrence of suicide attempts at 6months among patients at high risk of BPD. A logistical regression analysis showed pre-hospitalization antidepressant prescription to be associated with recidivism (OR=2.1, P=.037). CONCLUSION: Our exploratory study suggests that hospitalization may not increase suicide attempts among patients with BPD when the health organization does not include a specific device such as DBT.

Alcohol and repeated deliberate self-harm: preliminary results of the French cohort study of risk for repeated incomplete suicides.

BACKGROUND: Repeated episode(s) of deliberate self-harm (RDSH) is a major risk factor for suicide. AIMS: To identify specific risk factors for RDSH among patients admitted following an episode of deliberate self-harm (DSH) through acute intoxication. METHODS: A prospective 6-month study was conducted with 184 patients (71% female) admitted to the emergency room (ER) as a result of self-poisoning (SP). RESULTS: Rate of RDSH stood at 18% after 6 months. The sociodemographic variables associated with repeated deliberate self-harm were to have no principal activity, consultation with a medical professional during the 6 months preceding the self-poisoning, and referral to psychiatric services upon release from the ER. The clinical variable associated with RDSH was alcohol addiction (OR=2.7; IC 95%=1.2-6.1, p<.05) as assessed at the time of the initial ER admission. CONCLUSIONS: When patients are initially admitted to the ER as a result of self-poisoning, it is important to evaluate specific factors, particularly alcohol use, that could subsequently lead to repeated deliberate self-harm. The goal is to improve the targeting and referral of patients toward structures that can best respond to their needs.

Validation of the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire and Peritraumatic Distress Inventory in school-aged victims of road traffic accidents.

BACKGROUND: Although the reliable and valid Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI-C) and Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire (PDEQ) are useful for identifying adults at risk of developing acute and chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), they have not been validated in school-aged children and their predictive values remain unknown in this population. This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the children versions of these two measures (PDI-C and PDEQ-C) in a sample of French-speaking school-children. METHODS: One-hundred and thirty-three consecutive victims of road traffic accidents, aged 8-15 years, were recruited into this longitudinal study via the emergency room. The peritraumatic reactions were assessed at baseline and PTSD symptoms were assessed 1 month later. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.8 and 0.77 for the PDI-C and PDEQ-C, respectively. The 1-month test-retest correlation coefficient (n=33) was 0.77 for both measures. The PDI-C demonstrated a two-factor structure while the PDEQ-C displayed a one-factor structure. As with adults, the two measures were intercorrelated (r=0.52) and correlated with subsequent PTSD symptoms and diagnosis (r=0.21-0.56; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The children versions of the PDI and PDEQ are reliable and valid in children.

[Biological factors of PTSD: neurotransmitters and neuromodulators]. / Facteurs biologiques du stress post-traumatique: neurotransmission et neuromodulation.

Subjects with posttraumatic stress disorder exhibit abnormalities in many psychobiological systems. Studies of the effects of stress on learning and memory processes suggest that fear conditioning, behavioural sensitisation, and a failure of extinction may be important in the persistence and reexperiencing of traumatic memories and stress sensitivity. All these symptoms are supported by specific biological mechanisms including NMDA receptors, noradrenergic system, etc. Recent findings show that amino acid transmitters, glutamate and GABA, are intimately involved in the process of factual memory registration, and suggest that amine neurotransmitters, norepinephrine and serotonin, are involved in encoding emotional memory. In addition, research suggests that 5-HT neurones have directs effects on both adrenergic and HPA function. Such findings provide important information that should guide current pharmacological practice and the development of innovative biological therapeutics.

[Self-poisoning with Datura stramonium. 3 case reports]. / Intoxication volontaire par Datura stramonium. 3 observations.

BACKGROUND: Datura stramonium is a hallucinogenic plant that causes serious poisoning. Due to its easy availability and strong anticholinergic properties, substance users and teens may use Datura stramonium as a drug. Consumption of any part of the plant can result in severe toxicity. CASE REPORTS: 3 cases of acute self-poisoning by ingestion of Datura stramonium are reported. The patients presented with a typical anticholinergic syndrome: agitation, confusion, hallucinations and combative behaviour; all of them had mydriasis, but dry mouth and tachycardia were less common. All these 3 subjects had a good prognosis but have required hospitalisation because of severe psychiatric derangement with agitated behaviour. The patients were favourably managed with only symptomatic treatment. DISCUSSION: This article reviews the clinical syndrome associated with the toxicity. The severity of hallucinations and confusion, associated with pupillary dilation, flushing, dry mouth, and tachycardia, are related with Datura intoxication. Symptomatic treatment is efficient. CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians might be informed about the abuse of Datura stramonium, often associated with substance misuse, and the need to educate risk-patients.

Peritraumatic dissociation, acute stress, and early posttraumatic stress disorder in victims of general crime.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relation between peritraumatic dissociation and acute stress and the early development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in victims of general crime. METHOD: A total of 48 subjects were assessed within 24 hours of the trauma, using the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire Self-Report Version (PDEQ-SRV). They were followed longitudinally to assess acute stress (2 weeks after the assault,) using the Standford Acute Stress Reaction Questionnaire (SASRQ), and posttraumatic stress (at 5 weeks), using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) and the Impact of Event Scale (IES). RESULTS: Among PTSD subjects mean PDEQ scores were significantly higher (mean 3, SD 0.9) than in those without PTSD (mean 2.3, SD 0.7) (t = 2.78, df 46, P = 0.007). Among PTSD subjects, mean SASRQ scores were significantly higher (mean 97.9, SD 29.2) than in those without PTSD (mean 54.8, SD 28.2) (t = 4.9, df 46, P = 0.00007). CONCLUSIONS: High levels of peritraumatic dissociation and acute stress following violent assault are risk factors for early PTSD. Identifying acute reexperiencing can help the clinician identify subjects at highest risk.

[Victims of general crimes. Prospective and longitudinal assessment of psychological injuries]. / Victimes d'agression physique: évaluation prospective et longitudinale des blessures psychologiques.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the relations between acute psychological injury, particularly peritraumatic dissociation, and early development of posttraumatic stress disorder in victims of violence. METHODS: Thirty-five subjects were prospectively assessed in an emergency department, within 24 hours of the trauma, for acute dissociative experiences with the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire (PDEQ). All of them were followed longitudinally to assess post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) 5 weeks after with the Clinician-administered PTSD scale (CAPS) and the Impact of event scale (IES). RESULTS: Of the 35 victims 10 (28%) were diagnosed with a posttraumatic stress disorder at 5 weeks. Among PTSD subjects mean PDEQ scores were significantly higher (3+/-1.1) than in those without PTSD (2.3+/-0.7) (t=2.24, df=33, p=0.029). The PTSD subjects reported more "out of body experience" (p=0.015) and more "sense of body distorsion" (p=0.03) than non PTSD subjects. CONCLUSION: High levels of peritraumatic dissociation following violent assault are risk factors for early posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological assessment of acute traumatic dissociative experiences must be included in emergency departments.

[Biological factors of post-traumatic stress: neuroendocrine aspects]. / Facteurs biologiques du stress post-traumatique: aspects neuroendocriniens.

The core symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) include persistent reexperiencing of the traumatic event, avoidance of stimuli associated with the trauma, and autonomic hyperarousal. Many neurotransmitter systems and neurobiologic mechanisms may account for these primary symptoms of PTSD. Severe psychological trauma results in the parallel activation of these systems, producing an array of adaptive behavioral and physiologic responses necessary for survival. The pathophysiology of PTSD may involve dysfunction of several brain structures, particularly the amygdala, locus coeruleus, and hippocampus, as well as noradrenergic system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. The neuroendocrinology of PTSD, and specifically hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis alterations, are ways of examining biologic heterogeneity following trauma and its possible clinical implications. The decreased levels of cortisol, the increased responsiveness of glucocorticoid receptors, the increased sensitivity of the HPA negative feedback inhibition and its progressive sensitization are the neuroendocrine alterations specifically associated with the development of PTSD.

[Trauma, traumatic stress and depression following an airline catastrophy]. / Traumatismes, stress traumatique, et dépression à la suite de catastrophes aériennes.

OBJECTIVES: Acute stress responses following a trauma indicate a sensitivity to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and is often comorbid with depression. Earlier exposure to a traumatic event can be an additional risk factor in PTSD development. METHOD: Eight injured patients hospitalized after a major air disaster were monitored and assessed for a month. The symptoms of acute stress response (ASR), PTSD, and depression were assessed using DSM-IV criteria immediately following the accident, then each week thereafter. The Impact of Event Scale (IES) was completed on the 30th day (D30). RESULTS: Four patients presented with an ASR, and 3 of them had a PTSD at D30. Of those 3 patients with PTSD, 2 presented with an associated depression. These 2 patients had been exposed to a traumatic event before the disaster; and a significant relation was found between the history of the earlier trauma and the PTSD associated with depression. CONCLUSION: The traumatized victims with a history of earlier traumas seem more susceptible to developing a PTSD associated with depression.

[Acute peri-traumatic dissociative experiences: assessment and course]. / Troubles dissociatifs aigus péritraumatiques: évaluation et évolution.

Previous research has identified acute stress symptoms, particularly peri-traumatic dissociative symptoms (the distortion of consciousness, depersonalization, derealization, automatic movements, flashbacks with illusions or hallucinations), as risk factors for the development of later posttraumatic stress disorder. Numerous retrospective assessments and current prospective studies confirm these findings. It is suggested that peri-traumatic dissociation be assessed immediately after traumatic exposure and during the weeks following. But traumatized victims may present other categories of acute reactions; panic attacks, acute depression, conversion reaction, excessive emotional expression, and psychotic reactions. Brief reactive psychosis is a major differential diagnosis with peri-traumatic dissociative experiences. During emergency interventions it may be difficult to distinguish between dissociative and psychotic symptoms. It is cautioned that these disorders be evaluated with a follow-up of several months.

[Defense mechanisms and the prediction of PTSD]. / Mécanismes de défense et prédiction des états de stress post-traumatiques.

The purpose of this study was to assess mental defense mechanisms, characteristics of trauma and life events predicting the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Victims of traumatic events were recruited from a general university hospital. 23 participants were examined with a semi structured clinical interview, according to DSM IV criteria. All of them were assessed with the Social Readjustment Scale (Holmes et al., 1967), with the Traumatic Disorder Inventory Scale (Steinitz et al., 1992) and completed the Impact of Event Scale of Horowitz. All the subjects completed the Defense Style Questionnaire-40 (DSQ-40). The different mechanisms were ranked in three categories: mature, neurotic, and immature. Finally, we compared defense scores, trauma scores and life events scores between PTSD subjects and non PTSD subjects. 8 subjects were diagnosed as having PTSD compared to 15 not considered to have PTSD. Being alone during exposure significantly enhances the risk for the development of PTSD. Among PTSD subjects only reaction formation, a neurotic defense, was employed significantly more often than in those without PTSD. These findings suggest that mental defense mechanisms may be indicative of a risk for the development of PTSD after event exposure. Using DSQ-40, mature and immature defenses didn't differ, although reaction formation played a role, particularly in regard to traumatic memories and perseverative thoughts.